The trio shares a lot more specs, such as how they all have a 6.7-inches amoled screen with a 120-hz refreshing rate. Three cameras in the back may sound amazing these prices, but ultrawides and macro cameras on budget phones are usually not good, so it would be interesting to see if that's the case again here or if these cameras prove to be useful.
It's not just about megapixels though. Samsung specifically called the A36 Selfie Camera (and probably the A56's)-they may have fewer megapixels than the A26, but this 12-megapixel shooter is capable of 10-bit HDR footage up to 4K to 30 frames per second. This simply means that it will do a better job that represents colors in selfie videos.
Samsung said the A36 and A56 have a larger steam cooling system for better heat dissipation during extreme processing activities such as play, and this system is almost the same size as last year Galaxy S24+. They also support 45-wattic fast charging, which should reach you up to 70 percent in 30 minutes.
You have a performance
The main place where they all are different is performance. A26 5G and A56 5G use Samsung's own EXYNOS processors, specifically Exynos 1380 with 6 GB of RAM and Exynos 1580 with 8 GB of RAM, respectively. Galaxy A26 adjustment seems to be the same last year Galaxy A35 5gwith decent performance but still stuttery. But that phone was launched at $ 400 while the A26 was $ 100 less.
-and-A26-front-screen-(right)-Reviewer-Photo-SOURCE-Julian-Chokkattu.jpg)
Only the Galaxy A36 5G has a Qualcomm chipset, Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, a new chipset announced last year, although performance should be similar to Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 found on many international phones, such as POCO X6.
