Legal battles continue for the president Donald Trump Migrant deportations, especially those that involve Venezuelan immigrants who were sent to El Salvador. Former Public Prosecutor Bill Bar says that the judges who block these trips exceed their authority.
“There is a pattern that local court judges are trying to rape the president's responsibility in the national security zone,” Bar said on Tuesday.American news room“
“The president is completely right to frustrate and anxiety about the way the courts deal with this.”
Barr's comments, James James Bouasberg, follow up to stop the deportation of the alleged individuals that they are members of the gang, citing concerns about legal procedures. Boasberg also ordered the government to return the aircraft carrying migrants already deported.
American deportation trips to Venezuela appeal after a week
Former Public Prosecutor William B. ((Photo by Michael Reynolds Paul/Getty Emiez))
According to Paar, the ruling exceeds the authority of the judge and interferes with the presidential authorities of the president.
“The constitution gives the president the authority to issue rulings on how we deal with foreign citizens when we are being taken due to national security concerns,” said Bar, who served as the Trump prosecutor in 2019 and 2020.
“It is his call, not the invitation of the provincial court judge.”
Judge Boasberg requested more details about Al Salvador's flight, including when it landed and who was on the plane. However, the Trump administration was required The secrets of the state are a privilegeAllow her to block this information from the court.
President Donald Trump and American boycott judge James Boasberg were seen in this divided photo side by side. (Getty)
On Monday, government lawyers asked the Court of Appeal to lift Busburg's order and allow the deportation trips to appeal. Judges appeared on the painting divided, with Judge Patricia Melit Comparing the situation with the policies of World War II.
She said: “The Nazis obtained a better treatment under the foreign enemy law than what happened here,” the pretext that even the Nazis had hearing councils before they were deported, while it is claimed that the immigrants in this case did not receive any legal measures.
Bar says that this case emphasizes a wider case than the provincial court judges who are issuing judicial orders worldwide affecting the entire country.
“Even when it is appropriate for the court to play its traditional role in protecting the freedoms of American citizens, we have these phenomena of restraint orders in the country where the minimum boycott judge, the province's judges, try to link the entire nation and link the president to their initial decision. This is not what we meant by the judicial force according to our constitution.”
Supreme Court judge Elena Kagan expressed similar concerns in 2022 during a letter at the Law College in northwest Pritzker.
She said: “It cannot be right for the provincial judge to stop a policy at the country level in its paths and let it stop for the years that the regular process takes.”
Bur Supreme Court calls for intervention and resolving the case.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“If they (the US Supreme Court) are finally standing and deciding a case instead of retracting these decisions, I think it will come out in the right way,” he said.
“I think most of the judges value this absurdity.”
