First on the fox: president Donald Trump A memorandum on Thursday, which heads the heads of the government agency, signed the demand of federal judges to request financial guarantees to hold “activist” groups that the financially responsible government is sued if an unnecessary judicial order is found.
The memo comes at a time when the Trump administration faces more than 90 lawsuits The executive orders, notes and executive advertisements that were issued since January 20 arise that legal groups, work organizations, other local prosecutors and local prosecutors are a challenge.
Specifically, the memorandum announces federal agencies to coordinate with the public prosecutor Pam Bondi To request the federal courts to adhere to a base that imposes financial guarantees from those who seek restraining orders.
While federal judges ultimately have the final statement about whether these financial guarantees are required, the Ministry of Justice can request under Federal Ruling on Civil Procedures 65 (C) that the judges implement the required rule of financial guarantees from prosecutors who are equal to the potential costs and damages that the federal government will bear from a preliminary rod or a temporary order.
Scotus bases at approximately $ 2 billion in frozen USAID payments
The White House, Public Prosecutor Bam Bondi, requests that judges request a rule that requires financial guarantees from prosecutors looking for judicial orders. (Associated Press)
The signed memo applies to all lawsuits that seek to obtain preliminary judicial orders or temporary restrictions “where the government can show cash harm from the required relief,” according to the White House Fact newspaper.
“The agencies must justify the security amounts based on the logical harm assessments, which ensures that the courts refuse or resolve the restraint orders if the prosecutors fail to pay, in the absence of a good reason,” the White House said in the Fox News newspaper.
As a result, the White House said that the matter will be sentenced to “active judges” and maintains “litigants responsibility.”
The White House said in the fact newspaper: “Unleashed provinces have issued comprehensive orders beyond their authority, and to introduce themselves into the executive policies of the policies and suspended the policies supported by voters.”
The lawsuits that have already challenge the Trump administration began on its way to the Supreme Court. For example, the Supreme Court issued on Wednesday 5-4 to support the provincial judge’s order that requires the Trump administration to pay nearly $ 2 billion of foreign aid money.
The Supreme Court said that since the deadline for the boycott of the boycott on February 26, the Trump administration to pay the US International Development Agency financing contracts has finished implementing the case to the lower court to remove future payment plans.
The Supreme Court upheld the provincial judge’s ruling on March 5, 2025, which requires the Trump administration to pay nearly $ 2 billion of foreign aid money. (Anna Moneymaker)
The court said: “Given that the deadline for the challenged matter has now been approved, and in light of the ongoing preliminary judicial procedures, the provincial court must clarify the obligations that the government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restriction order, taking into account the feasibility of any compliance time schedules.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
Kerri Urbahn and Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.
