Unlock Digent Editor FREE
Roula Khalaf, editor of FT, chooses her favorite stories this weekly newsletter.
Thames Water has received judicial consent to a controversial loan of 3 billion GBP from creditors, including Hedge Fund Elliott Management, which should allow the greatest British hydroelectric power to avert immediate renationalization.
A group of junior creditors, which caused substantial losses under the agreement, questioned the Loan agreement with the London Court of Appeal in the hearing, which was concluded last week.
However, the judges decided on Monday that the agreement could only continue with a small addition that tightened the previously sweeping period published by the director of the future court proceedings.
The decision should allow a strongly indebted approach to fresh funds while trying to increase their own capital to strengthen its long -term finances. However, this could be subject to further appeal at the Supreme Court.
Chris Weston, CEO DrumHe said on Monday that the company remained from the opinion that “market -guided solution” is in the “best interest of customers, British taxpayers and a wider economy”.
Environmental activists leadership by liberal democratic deputy Charlie Maynard opposed the plan in court and claimed that it was in the public interest that the instrument was renationalized under the Special Government Administration.
Opponents are afraid of interest rates 9.75 % plus additional fees that could stand in total Thames Water More than 800 million GBP. The company already pays at least 15 million GBP per month for fees to advisors, lawyers and consultants.
A group of so -called class creditors and a loan on Monday claimed that “customers will be placed in the reconstruction center and will not bear the costs of restructuring”.
The initial tranhes of 1.5 billion GBP will be provided in installments until September to prevent the thorn from racing money, with another 1.5 billion GBP, two transes of 750 million GBP to further extend liquidity until May.
The loan agreement is only one part of the restructuring plan because the company is struggling with a debt of almost 20 billion GBP. The company is also looking for new investors to put capital into business under the process operated by the Rothschild Investment Bank.
The KKR and CKI infrastructure, as well as the Covalis and Castle Water Hedge Fund, have expressed their interest in agreement. Class creditors and also stated to submit an offer if a serious offer appears.
Some of these potential candidates have stated that they will maintain their interest if the company is to be renationalized. In this case, the debt would be restructured by interest frozen and release cash from customers' accounts for investment in infrastructure. Any government loan could be obtained if the company was then sold to new investors.
The B -Class Group, which also prefers special administration to the current loan, said it was “disappointed” by the decision of the Court of Appeal, but “pleased” that the director issues that “permanently maintained, are inappropriate”, was changed.
The lenders with a lower assessment added that “they will continue to examine all available ways, including the search for holiday appeal to the Supreme Court”.
The Court of Appeal ruled that the provisions in the original decision published by the Director of the Criminal Disputes should be changed in such a way that it “does not use” for any future claims, “special administrator” or “insolvency offices”.
During the hearing of the Lord justice Zacaroli, one of the panel of the three arbitrators who decided on the appeal, he noted that the width of the release of litigation appeared “more novel than I saw in previous cases”.
While the defense attorney Thames Water Tom Smith KC has suggested that there is “nothing wrong”, Mark Phillips KC, acting for class B creditors, claimed that the original wording could make a lawsuit against the directors if it were to come across a special administrative regime in the future.
