The controversial land law in the court challenge


A legal challenge was presented against the controversial new land seizure law at the Tobility Center with US President Donald Trump by the Democratic Alliance (DA), which is part of the South African coalition government.

Confiscation It is allowed to seize private lands by the government without compensation in some cases.

Trump freezed external aid to the country as a result, claiming that the land is already confiscated.

The government, which consists of 10 parties led by the African National Congress (ANC), said that the actions of the American president are based on “a campaign of wrong information and advertising aimed at distorting our great nation.”

The African National Congress Party has been forced into the power participation agreement Last year, after losing its parliamentary majority, for the first time in three decades, in the general elections in May.

DA, the second largest coalition party, described the unconstitutional confiscation law, on the pretext that no democratic government should be granted powers to seize property without compensation.

He said that South African President Cyril Ramavusa signed a law against her advice.

Land ownership has always been a controversial issue in South Africa, with most of the private agricultural lands by white people 30 years after the end of the apartheid system in the apartheid.

There were continuous calls to the government to address land reform and deal with the previous injustice of the racist semester.

But in her argument against the confiscation law, Da Al -Bayda says that the apartheid government has used similar powers to remove indigenous societies from its territory, and that it wants to protect property rights for all South Africa.

“This history teaches us that real remedy requires the protection of property rights, and to ensure that no government is given the powers of confiscation that is not allocated again,” the party said in a statement.

In a statement last week, Da said he was very concerned about Trump's threat to stop financing.

The African National Congress Party said that no land was seized without compensation and added that it would only happen in exceptional circumstances, as if the land was needed for public use and all other ways to acquire the land had exhausted.

Trump's executive order said during the weekend that the United States “cannot support the government of violations of the South African Rights Committee in its country.”

As long as South Africa continues to “these ill and immoral practices”, the United States will not help or help.

The White House said Washington will also formulate a plan to resettle South African farmers and their families as refugees.

She said that US officials will take steps to determine the priorities of humanitarian relief, including acceptance and resettlement through the admission program for refugees in the United States of the Africans in South Africa, most of whom are egg descendants of the first Dutch and French settlers.

President Ramavusa said that he will send envoys to various countries to explain the recent political changes of the government, including the confiscation law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *