I asked the Trump administration supreme court On Thursday to intervene and allow a narrow copy of his executive order that prohibits the nationality of the feet to move forward, three judicial orders were challenged at the country level brought in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington.
The judges in those states immediately moved to prevent the president Donald TrumpAn order that prohibits the new citizenship, which he signed on his first day in his position.
The three courts have banned the country – the Trump administration's lawyers argued at Submit the Supreme Court Very wide.
In the court’s lawsuit on Thursday, the United States’s public attorney Sarah Harris said that the courts had gone to a large extent, and asked the Supreme Court judges to limit the scope of rulings to cover only individuals who were directly affected by the relevant courts.
The ninth circle refuses Trump's attempt to restore the birth of the generator
President Donald Trump signs executive orders at the Oval Office on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Harris wrote: “These cases – which involve challenges on the presidential executive order on January 20, 2025 regarding the newborn citizenship – raises important constitutional questions with great repercussions to secure the borders,” Harris wrote.
“But at this stage, the government comes to this court with a” modest “request: While the parties receive heavy advantages questions, the court should” restrict the scope “of multiple initial orders that” PraPor (T) to cover every person in the country “, which actually limits those orders on the parties within power.
the Executive order In the question, he sought to clarify the fourteenth amendment, which states, “All the people born or naturalized in the United States, and are subject to the judicial state, are citizens in the United States and the country where they reside.”
The entrance to the customs and the protection of the American border appears on the 14th Street in Washington, DC (Istock)
Instead, the language developed by the Trump administration, which was later banned, has made it clear that individuals born to illegal immigrant fathers, or those who were legally here but in temporary non -immigrant visas, were not citizens by birth.
To date, no court has stood alongside the executive order of the Trump administration that seeks to ban the newly born citizenship, although many provinces courts prevented her from secret.
For its part, the Ministry of Justice sought to describe the regime as “an integral part of President Trump's broader effort to reform the immigration system in the United States, and to address the continuous crisis on the southern border.”
It was originally scheduled to enter the executive order on February 19, and it could affect hundreds of thousands of children born in the United States annually.
The Supreme Court judges were seen attending the sixtieth opening ceremony in the Capitol in Washington, DC. (Ricky Carioti /Washington Post via Gettie Emmy)
More than 22 American states and immigrant rights groups filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to prevent the prohibition on citizenship in the field of birth, arguing in the court files that the executive order is unconstitutional and “unprecedented”.
The states have also argued that the fourteenth amendment, in fact, guarantees citizenship for people born on American soil and naturalized in the United States
The United States is one of about 30 countries where Co -citizenship It is applied.
