“What is so great on Starlink?”: Shankar Sharma says that the 1991 reforms remained Indian companies lazy


Indian liberalization in 1991 could unlock growth, but the country also stood on the path of addiction, at least from the perspective of a veteran investor and founder Gquant Investtech Shankar Shama.

Sharma, when he spoke on a podcast with Rishi Sanghvii, said that the capital and technologies that flooded in the post-refund had left Indian businesses “lazy”, depending on foreign partnerships and not motivated to build global technological dominance.

“Indian businesses gave it a very lazy and very easy way to get out,” he said. “Just make common businesses, get capital, get technology … and life is sorted. That's exactly what our Indian companies have done – date.”

Sharma, he thought about decades since 1991, said, “The only bad thing she did for India's liberalization was that it opened up … floods into global capital to enter.

Sharma pointed out the persistent outcome of this thinking: “We don't have any society that dominates even South Asia, let alone Asia, let alone Europe, and forget America… not one society.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlbnb2moiy8

He blamed this of Indian companies that plunged into foreign joint ventures and passed access to the market in exchange for capital and technology – without building the original strength. “Finally, what was created? Nothing.”

Equally critical of government policy towards Elon Musk. “What is so great on Starlink? It's a low-end, low-tech … there's nothing big.” Sharma asked why India gave Muska a “free pass”, while domestic companies had to navigate heavy license fees and regulations.

“If I were the creator of politics, I wouldn't allow these things,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *